MULTIVARIANT ANALYSIS OF MEN FROM INFERTILE COUPLES WITH AND WITHOUT ANTISPERM ANTIBODIES

Citation
Da. Gubin et al., MULTIVARIANT ANALYSIS OF MEN FROM INFERTILE COUPLES WITH AND WITHOUT ANTISPERM ANTIBODIES, AMERICAN JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE IMMUNOLOGY, 39(2), 1998, pp. 157-160
Citations number
17
Categorie Soggetti
Reproductive Biology",Immunology
ISSN journal
10467408
Volume
39
Issue
2
Year of publication
1998
Pages
157 - 160
Database
ISI
SICI code
1046-7408(1998)39:2<157:MAOMFI>2.0.ZU;2-W
Abstract
PROBLEM: Research studies in animal and human systems have demonstrate d conclusively that antisperm antibodies can interfere with fertilizat ion. In the male, autoantibodies to sperm can be detected both in the sera and seminal plasma.METHOD OF STUDY: Ninety-seven men who were tes ted for antisperm antibodies as a part of an infertility evaluation we re identified. Complete medical history was obtained, including inform ation related to events suspected of being associated with antisperm a ntibodies. History of surgery (varicocele repair, hernia repair, and v as reversal) and infection (epididymitis, sexually transmitted disease , and orchitis) were compared with semen parameters (motility less tha n 60%, concentration less than 20 x 10(6), and volume less than 2 cc). These were compared to antisperm antibody results of mixed agglutinat ion reaction (MAR) and direct immunobead binding test (IBT) for immuno globulin G (IgG). Statistical analysis was performed using Fishers exa ct two-tailed test. RESULTS: As expected, prior vas reversal was signi ficantly associated with the presence of antisperm. antibodies (P = 0. 0002) by MAR or IBT with a fivefold increased relative risk (95% confi dence interval, 1.97-12.38). Other surgeries manipulating the cord str uctures independent of vas reversal were not associated with antisperm antibodies (P = 0.09). Prior infections, independent of vas reversal, were significantly associated with antisperm antibodies by MAR (P = 0 .04) with a 3.8-fold increased relative risk (95% confidence interval, 1.06-13.87) but not by IBT. Sperm concentration less than 20 x 10(6), motility less than 60%, and a volume less than 2 cc were not associat ed with antisperm antibodies by MAR or IBT. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that manipulation of the cord structures excluding the vas we re not associated with antisperm antibodies; however, vas reversal and prior infection are significant risk factors for the development of a ntisperm antibodies.