In this investigation, neuropsychological testing was conducted with 6
9 college students that were instructed to malinger either multiple sc
lerosis (MS) or traumatic brain injury (TIB) or were non-malingering c
ontrols. The two malingering soups were divided into informed and non-
informed groups. The informed groups received information concerning t
heir respective condition, and the non-informed groups were asked simp
ly to malinger. Generally, all malingering groups performed considerab
ly below the levels of non-malingering controls on measures of attenti
on, learning and memory, word fluency, abstract reasoning, visuoconstr
uction and manual dexterity. There appeared to be no difference in the
manner in which subjects attempted to malinger MS as opposed to TBI.
However, the severity of the portrayed deficit suggested by the test s
cores was disproportionate to the severity of the injury being request
ed. The pattern of deficit presented was quite global, with well below
average performance demonstrated by all malingering groups across all
domains.