Mjd. Roberts, THE CONCEPT OF LUXURY IN BRITISH POLITICAL-ECONOMY - SMITH,ADAM TO MARSHALL,ALFRED, History of the human sciences, 11(1), 1998, pp. 23-47
Citations number
63
Categorie Soggetti
History of Social Sciences","History & Philosophy of Sciences","History & Philosophy of Sciences","History & Philosophy of Sciences
In the discourse of 18th-century British intellectuals the term 'luxur
y' held a well-recognized and much disputed place. Dispute arose chief
ly around the problem of disentangling the economic, moral-theological
and political strands of the term. The object of the present paper is
to trace forward the history of debate over the concept along one dev
eloping line of specialization - that of 19th-century political econom
y. It will be seen how the term luxury (and related terms: necessity,
decency, productive, unproductive, etc.) adjusted meaning(s) as the ec
onomic, social and intellectual contexts in which it was embedded them
selves mutated. In particular, it is argued, the changing significance
attached to the term illustrates the extent to which a key 19th-centu
ry intellectual elite managed to accommodate the implications of a tra
nsition from a society based on assumptions of scarcity and hierarchy
to one that was beginning to contemplate the possibility of mass marke
t abundance. While the profession's leaders did develop a sharpened in
terest in aspiration to luxury consumption as a legitimate motor of ec
onomic growth, all registered their disapproval of certain forms of th
e aspiration, revealing in the process a variety of class, gender and
'race' preoccupations - including (from J. S. Mill onwards) a particul
ar distaste for positional or status-related consumption.