Information flowing into a market from firms can stimulate competitive
activity and consumer dynamics that ultimately improve the functionin
g of that market (e.g., improve product quality), However, prior resea
rch has provided limited empirical evidence regarding the conditions u
nder which (1) information confers such benefits on the market, (2) fi
rms make strategic use of such information flows, and (3) consumer beh
avior influences the achievement of these market effects and strategic
benefits, The author performs a longitudinal quasi-experiment to inve
stigate these issues using the introduction of the Nutrition Labeling
and Education Act (NLEA) as a research context. Results indicate that
information did promote consumer dynamics that may have fostered compe
titive activity among firms. Specifically, marketers changed the quali
ty of base brands and their brand extensions in unique and opposite wa
ys that enabled brands to occupy distinct strategic positions in the m
arket. Market information also influenced the nature of competitive ri
valry by shifting price promotion levels depending on the healthy posi
tioning of firm brands. Such approaches were speculated to provide fir
ms with a means of coping with the uncertainty of competitive and cons
umer reactions to the NLEA, extending theories of the market-level eff
ects of information to include the strategic use of such information b
y firms.