If we are to justify normative communication, we must contend with the
question of ''why, other than as a response to force, should I accept
those norms that are not of my own devising - especially in light of
contemporary scholarship which claims that any warrants offered for th
em are inextricably linked with systems of power?'' I respond to that
question here through a critical appropriation of resources in the wor
k of Michel Foucault and Jurgen Habermas. To counter what I see as a t
endency toward individualism in Foucault and a tendency toward totaliz
ation in Habermas, I supplement their accounts with a phenomenological
description of the actual process by which human beings are made into
subjects.