Ev. Nunes et al., IMIPRAMINE TREATMENT OF OPIATE-DEPENDENT PATIENTS WITH DEPRESSIVE-DISORDERS - A PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL, Archives of general psychiatry, 55(2), 1998, pp. 153-160
Background: The literature is inconclusive on the role of antidepressa
nt medications in treating drug dependence. Studies have either not fo
cused on depressed patients or have selected patients with depressive
disorders based on cross-sectional symptoms rather than a syndromal di
agnosis. A clinical trial of an antidepressant was, therefore, conduct
ed on drug-dependent patients with syndromal depression. Methods: Pati
ents receiving methadone hydrochloride maintenance treatment were sele
cted if they met the criteria for a DSM-III-R depressive disorder that
was chronologically primary, had persisted during a past abstinent pe
riod or was long-standing, and persisted during at least I month of st
able methadone treatment. Subjects were randomized to a 12-week, doubl
e-blind, placebo-controlled trial of imipramine hydrochloride. A favor
able response was defined as a Clinical Global Impression scale score
for depression of 2 (''much improved'') or 1 (''very much improved'')
and at least a 75% reduction in self-reported drug or alcohol use or a
bstinence. Results: One hundred thirty-seven patients were randomized,
and 84 completed a minimum adequate trial of at least 6 weeks. Among
the 84 adequately treated patients, 57% (24/42) receiving imipramine w
ere rated as responders compared with 7% (3/42) receiving placebo (P <
.001). On measures of mood, there was a robust effect of imipramine, I
mipramine was superior to placebo on some self-reported measures of su
bstance use and craving, and mood improvement was associated with impr
ovement in self-reported substance use. However, few patients achieved
urine-confirmed abstinence. Conclusions: Imipramine was an effective
antidepressant in patients receiving methadone who were selected via s
yndromal criteria for depressive illness, Imipramine patients whose mo
od improves; however, this effect was less robust.