Ig. Lawrence et al., CORRECTING IMPOTENCE IN THE MALE DIALYSIS PATIENT - EXPERIENCE WITH TESTOSTERONE REPLACEMENT AND VACUUM TUMESCENCE THERAPY, American journal of kidney diseases, 31(2), 1998, pp. 313-319
Sexual dysfunction remains a common and often distressing problem in t
he male dialysis population. Traditionally its management has consiste
d of correction of anemia, optimization of dialysis, removal of implic
ated medication, and finally depot injections of a testosterone eater.
At a dedicated renal impotence clinic, we studied the effectiveness o
f testosterone replacement in men with biochemically proven hypogonadi
sm and then vacuum tumescence therapy in those with continued erectile
dysfunction. Depot testosterone was given to 27 patients (aged 52.4 /- 2.5 years; duration of dialysis, 2.00 +/- 0.40 years; and duration
of sexual dysfunction, 2.92 +/- 0.49 years): sexual function was fully
restored in only three (11.1%), and two gradually lost the response o
ver 18 months. Nineteen patients (70.3%) had partial responses, varyin
g from an increased sense of well-being alone to restored sexual funct
ion apart from an impairment of the duration of penile erection. Five
patients (18.5%) had no response, and testosterone was contraindicated
in another four. Four of the treated patients (14.8%) reported fluid
retention. Vacuum tumescence devices were then offered to 32 patients
who remained impotent but declined by six. Twenty-six patients (aged 4
9.6 +/- 2.2 years; duration of dialysis, 2.50 +/- 0.58 years; and dura
tion of sexual dysfunction, 3.26 +/- 0.56 years) used the devices, wit
h 19 (73.1%) having full correction of their erectile dysfunction; six
also continued with depot testosterone to maintain their libido. Peni
le discomfort was described by five patients (19.2%) whose potency was
not restored. A further five predialysis patients have used the devic
es, and all had correction of their erectile dysfunction. The correcti
on of biochemical hypogonadism in the male dialysis population with te
stosterone rarely restores sexual function to normal, whereas vacuum t
umescence therapy corrects penile erection dysfunction in most patient
s. (C) 1998 by the National Kidney Foundation, Inc.