This article analyzes the outcome of over 75,000 promotion decisions a
ffecting middle-grade Naval officers between 1984 and 1993. Theory pre
dicts that promotion rates of men should exceed promotion rates of wom
en, while promotion rates of Caucasians should exceed promotion rates
of minorities. With respect to women, the data analyzed are generally
consistent with theory at the higher rank investigated. Promotion-rate
differences between men and women also indicate that theory may be mo
re valid between 1984 and 1988. With respect to minorities, aggregate
data are consistent with theory. However, in the latter years investig
ated, promotion-rare differences between Caucasians and minorities are
less extreme and promotion rates of African Americans and Hispanics t
o captain are substantially higher than promotion rates of Caucasians
to captain. Despite their successes, women and minority Naval officers
turnover at high rates and are still grossly under represented in the
officer corps.