D. Longshore et S. Turner, SELF-CONTROL AND CRIMINAL OPPORTUNITY - CROSS-SECTIONAL TEST OF THE GENERAL-THEORY OF CRIME, Criminal justice and behavior, 25(1), 1998, pp. 81-98
In this study, the authors tested two hypotheses drawn from the genera
l theory of crime. The first hypothesis is that low self-control is a
major individual-level cause of crime. The second, that the effect of
self-control is contingent on criminal opportunity. The measure of sel
f-control used was a 23-item self-report index. To measure criminal op
portunity, two proxy variables were used: gender and crime-involved fr
iends. Crime measures included number of criminal acts of force and nu
mber of criminal acts of fraud reported in a 6-month recall period by
a sample of 522 criminal offenders. Self-control was lower among offen
ders reporting more crimes of force and fraud, but the variance explai
ned by self-control was low in each case. The relationship between sel
f-control and fraud crimes was contingent on criminal opportunity, but
the relationship between self-control and force crimes was not. Impli
cations of these findings for the general theory of crime are reviewed
.