Sj. Ham et al., EXTERNAL AND INTERNAL HEMIPELVECTOMY FOR SARCOMAS OF THE PELVIC GIRDLE - CONSEQUENCES OF LIMB-SALVAGE TREATMENT, European journal of surgical oncology, 23(6), 1997, pp. 540-546
The outcome of different Limb-saving treatment modalities for pelvic g
irdle sarcoma is controversial. The oncological and functional results
after 11 external and 10 internal hemipelvectomies and the consequenc
es of limb-salvage treatment were studied in 21 consecutive patients w
ith primary bone (19 patients) or soft tissue sarcoma (two patients) o
f the pelvic girdle, Following external hemipelvectomy 10 patients (91
%) died after a median follow-up of 1.6 years (range: 0.3-7.1). Isolat
ed local recurrences occurred in three patients (27%), with concomitan
t distant failure in one (9%), while isolated distant failure occurred
in sis patients (55%), The rate of flap necrosis and wound infection
following external hemipelvectomy were both 25%. Following internal he
mipelvectomy, nine patients (90%) were alive without evidence of disea
se after a median follow-up of 6.6 years (range: 2.3-16.0), Concomitan
t local and distant failures were found in one patient (10%), Reconstr
uction-related complications necessitated revisional procedures in fiv
e of seven patients (72%), leading to external hemipelvectomy in one,
Patients with a focally advanced pelvic girdle sarcoma who ape unable
to under an internal hemipelvectomy a worse prognosis than patients wh
o undergo an internal hemipelvectomy. An internal hemipelvectomy is no
t attended by an increased risk of local failure, but is by long-term
local complications requiring extensive surgical procedures.