H. Allain et al., EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL METHODS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF ANTI-ALZHEIMER DRUGS, Fundamental and clinical pharmacology, 12(1), 1998, pp. 13-29
Methodology used for the development of anti-Alzheimer's disease (AD)
drugs raises specific problems which are rarely examined in the litera
ture. While the general development scheme is similar to that required
for most drugs, some specific aspects must be analyzed, highly domina
ted by the dual goal of pharmacology, ie, to obtain both symptomatic a
nd etiopathogenic drugs. During preclinical studies, aged or lesioned
animals are mainly useful for symptomatic drugs, whereas transgenic mo
dels or neurodegeneration-induced techniques would probably lead to et
iopathogenic drugs potentially slowing down the process of AD. The fir
st administrations of a new compound to human beings raise the questio
n of the activity measurement techniques. Psychometry remains the most
informative procedure to detect and analyze the activity of the drugs
on the different components of cognition. Electrophysiology and neuro
imaging need some complementary studies before they can be proposed as
surrogate criteria in phase III trials. At this stage of development,
American and the recently published European guidelines are of great
help while insisting on long-term (6 months) placebo controlled trials
with the use of the triple efficacy criterion: an objective cognition
scale, a global assessment, and the opinion of the caregiver. In the
long term, pharmacoepidemiology and pharmacoeconomy will have to confi
rm the rationale of this recent progress in the methodology of anti-AD
drug development. (C) 1998 Elsevier, Paris.