Am. Batterham et Kp. George, MODELING THE INFLUENCE OF BODY-SIZE AND COMPOSITION ON M-MODE ECHOCARDIOGRAPHIC DIMENSIONS, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology, 43(2), 1998, pp. 701-708
The purpose of this study was to determine the optimal index for norma
lizing left ventricular (LV) echocardiographic dimensions for differen
ces in body size. M-mode echocardiograms defined LV internal dimension
at end diastole (LVIDD) and LV wall thickness (LVWT) in 107 adults (5
9 male, 48 female). Allometric relations were assessed between cardiac
dimensions (Y) and body size variables (X) of fat-free mass (FFM), he
ight (H), body surface area (BSA), and fat mass (FM). Further to confi
rmation of homogeneity of regression slopes, size exponents common to
both genders were fitted by a log-linear model: In Y = In a + c.gender
+ b.lnX, where a is the proportionality coefficient, b is the size ex
ponent, and c is the gender coefficient. For LVIDD, mean body size exp
onents (95% confidence interval) were FFM0.35 (0.22-0.47), H-0.68 (0.3
2-1.03), and BSA(0.44) (0.26-0.62). For LVWT, the derived exponents we
re FFM0.43 (0.20-0.65), H-0.65 (0-1.3), and BSA(0.56) (0.23-0.89). Bod
y fatness (expressed by FM) had no influence on LV dimensions, with ex
ponents not different from zero (P > 0.05). The root-mean-squares erro
r from the separate regression models indicated that the FFM index was
the optimal solution. Indexation of LV dimensions by H was associated
with the greatest error. Because the 95% confidence interval for the
FFM exponents included 0.33, we recommend that linear LV dimensions be
indexed by the cube root of FFM. In the absence of FFM data, the root
of BSA was found to be the best surrogate index.