N. Frossard et al., CONSISTENCY OF THE EFFICACY OF CETIRIZINE AND EBASTINE ON SKIN REACTIVITY, Annals of allergy, asthma, & immunology, 80(1), 1998, pp. 61-65
Background: At therapeutic dosage, cetirizine and ebastine induce sign
ificant inhibition of skin reactivity to histamine. The consistency of
their efficacy, that is, efficacy with the least interindividual vari
ability among subjects, has not been carefully assessed, however. Obje
ctive: To compare the consistency and efficacy of these antihistamines
on skin reactivity. Methods: Twenty-four healthy volunteers participa
ted in a randomized double-blind crossover study. The areas of wheals
and flares induced by increasing (0, 5, 10, 50, 100, 200, and 300 mg/m
L) histamine concentrations, administered by prick tests, were measure
d before and four hours after intake of 10 mg of each antihistamine, a
llowing concentration-response curves to be established. The threshold
histamine concentrations inducing wheal areas of 3 mm2 (positivity) w
ere calculated by interpolation. The coefficient of variation (SD/mean
%) was used to evaluate the consistency of the response. Results: Pre
treatment concentration-response curves were similar, and threshold co
ncentrations identical (0.29 mg/mL and 0.34 mg/mL for cetirizine and e
bastine, respectively). For both, curves were lower after treatment th
an before. After cetirizine, the threshold concentration was significa
ntly higher (217 mg/mL) than after ebastine (0.82 mg/mL) (P < .001), a
nd total inhibition of the wheal reaction was observed in 21 of 24 pat
ients at the lowest histamine concentration and in 17 of 24 at the hig
hest. Ebastine never totally inhibited reaction, even to 5 mg/mL of hi
stamine. Over the entire concentration-response curve, the coefficient
of variation for the wheal reaction was 6.3% for cetirizine and 72.6%
for ebastine, and, for flares, 11.0% and 83.7%, respectively. Hence,
variability was much lower after cetirizine. Conclusion: Our study sho
ws clearly that the efficacy of a single therapeutic dosage of cetiriz
ine is consistently good for suppression of cutaneous reactivity to hi
stamine in healthy volunteers. The need for ebastine to metabolize int
o the active carebastine might explain its lesser consistency.