The interpretation of mixtures of DNA in the forensic context presents
particular challenges. The only logical means available for dealing w
ith them is through Bayesian inference, which leads to the formulation
, in most cases, of a likelihood ratio which weighs the evidence in fa
vour of two competing hypotheses. However, situations can arise in whi
ch additional hypotheses are proposed and the authors discuss one such
situation - that where the number of contributors to the mixture is i
n dispute. A way of dealing with the problem is presented.