Most of our understanding of the Earth's interior has been derived fro
m measurements from global seismic networks, although no network has e
ver been truly ''global'' because some 71% of the Earth's surface is u
nderwater. The resulting gaps in coverage produce a biased and incompl
ete image of the Earth. Work has begun toward establishing permanent o
bservatories on the deep seafloor, although the technical difficulties
remain severe. Will these stations be useful, and where and how shall
they be established? Data from seafloor observatories will be of poor
er quality than continental site data because the sea surface is an im
portant and local source of broadband noise. This noise is derived fro
m wind and waves through direct forcing at long periods and by nonline
ar coupling to elastic waves at short periods. Our understanding of th
e generation and propagation of seismic noise and of wind and wave cli
matology can be used to predict the temporal and geographical variabil
ity of the noise spectrum and to assess likely sites for permanent sea
floor observatories. High noise levels near 1 Hz may raise detection l
imits for short-period, teleseismic arrivals above m(b) = 7.5, limitin
g the usefulness of many seafloor sites. Noise levels in deep borehole
s will be 10 dB quieter than those at the seafloor, but sensors buried
short distances below the seafloor may also provide comparable noise
levels and fidelity. The retrieval of data from permanent seafloor obs
ervatories remains an unsolved problem, but longterm temporary arrays
of ocean bottom seismometers are now being used in regional scale expe
riments using earthquakes as sources. Such experiments are likely to b
e less successful in the Pacific basin than in either the Indian Ocean
or North Atlantic Ocean because of higher noise levels.