Lm. Hanser, LESSONS FOR THE NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF EDUCATIONAL-PROGRESS FROM MILITARY STANDARD-SETTING, Applied measurement in education, 11(1), 1998, pp. 81-95
Citations number
10
Categorie Soggetti
Psychology, Educational","Psychologym Experimental","Education & Educational Research
The U.S. military services have a long history of setting and using st
andards. It is important to understand how military and education cont
exts differ if one is to transfer any standard-setting lessons from th
e miliary to the public education sector. First, the military system r
egularly rotates personnel from operational to training positions and
back again. This provides a natural feedback loop along which informat
ion is passed to assist the training establishment in knowing its succ
esses and failures. Second, military standards are ultimately linked a
s closely as possible to real-world outcomes. Military standards matte
r, and especially so to trainers whose lives may later rely on the abi
lities of their former students. The major distinction and lesson to b
e learned from military experience is that to be useful, standards mus
t be grounded in real-world outcomes that affect the lives of educator
s. National Assessment of Educational Progress standards currently app
ear to be lacking on both counts.