Jy. Margulies et al., SUBSTITUTION OF TRANSPEDICULAR SCREWS BY HOOK CLAWS IN A VERTEBRECTOMY MODEL, Journal of spinal disorders, 11(1), 1998, pp. 36-40
At times one pedicle screw cannot be used in a posterior construct bec
ause of morphometric reasons or when the pedicle is fractured intraope
ratively. It is not clear from the literature whether and to what exte
nt a construct's stability is compromised by substituting a hook claw
for one pedicle screw. A synthetic vertebra model using a hook claw in
lieu of a pedicle screw in a compressive and torsional mechanical stu
dy is evaluated. Isola screw-based constructs varying in the number of
pedicle screws and hook claws were used. To recreate a realistic clin
ical scenario, transverse connectors and a Harms cage were used as wel
l. In compression. substituting screws with claws did not substantiall
y change the stiffness, whereas substituting one or two pedicle screws
with one or two hook claws significantly reduced torsional stiffness.
We conclude that using one or two hook claws is a viable alternative
for pedicle screws when the latter cannot be used in a clinical situat
ion, especially as an adjunct when the anterior column is reconstructe
d.