DIVERT ASSESSMENT OF SMALL AIRWAYS REACTIVITY IN HUMAN-SUBJECTS

Citation
Em. Wagner et al., DIVERT ASSESSMENT OF SMALL AIRWAYS REACTIVITY IN HUMAN-SUBJECTS, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, 157(2), 1998, pp. 447-452
Citations number
19
Categorie Soggetti
Emergency Medicine & Critical Care","Respiratory System
ISSN journal
1073449X
Volume
157
Issue
2
Year of publication
1998
Pages
447 - 452
Database
ISI
SICI code
1073-449X(1998)157:2<447:DAOSAR>2.0.ZU;2-N
Abstract
Our knowledge of airways reactivity to inflammatory agonists is derive d predominantly from tests dominated by large airway responsiveness. T o determine directly, the histamine responsiveness of the smallest air ways, eight normal and 11 asymptomatic asthmatic subjects were studied utilizing a wedged bronchoscope technique. A fiberoptic bronchoscope was wedged in the anterior segment of the right upper lobe and a doubl e-lumen catheter was advanced through the working channel to its tip. With a constant flow of gas (5% CO2 in air) through one lumen of the c atheter, pressure at the tip of the bronchoscope was measured with the subject breath-holding at FRC. Peripheral airways resistance (Rp) was measured at baseline and after saline, histamine (10, 50, 100 mg/ml) and isoproterenol (2 mg/ml) challenge through the bronchoscope. Baseli ne Rp of asthmatics (0.041 +/- 0.015 cm H2O/ml/min; mean +/- SE) was s ignificantly greater than normal subjects (0.011 +/- 0.003 cm H2O/ml/m in; p = 0.019). The log of the concentration of histamine that caused a 100% increase in peripheral airways response was greater in the norm al subjects than in the asthmatic subjects (p = 0.0114) and correlated with whole lung responsiveness to histamine in asthmatics (r = 0.847, p < 0.05). Isoproterenol reversed completely the increase in Rp in no rmal subjects but not asthmatic subjects. The results of this study de monstrate that the resistance of the smallest peripheral airways, when measured directly, increased when challenged locally with histamine i n both normal subjects and asthmatic subjects. However, the peripheral airways responsiveness was significantly enhanced in asthmatic subjec ts relative to normal controls.