Am. Elbahnasy et al., LOWER CALICEAL STONE CLEARANCE AFTER SHOCK-WAVE LITHOTRIPSY OR URETEROSCOPY - THE IMPACT OF LOWER POLE RADIOGRAPHIC ANATOMY, The Journal of urology, 159(3), 1998, pp. 676-682
Purpose: We determine whether there is a significant relationship betw
een the spatial anatomy of the lower pole, as seen on preoperative exc
retory urography (IVP), and the outcome after shock wave lithotripsy o
r ureteroscopy for a solitary lower pole caliceal stone 15 mm. or less
. Materials and Methods: Between January 1992 and June 1996, 34 patien
ts with 15 mm, or less solitary lower pole stone underwent ureteroscop
y with intracorporeal lithotripsy (13) or extracorporeal shock wave li
thotripsy (ESWL dagger) with a Dornier HM3 lithotriptor dagger (21). O
n pretreatment IVP lower pole infundibular length and width, infundibu
lopelvic angle of the stone bearing calix were measured. Stone size an
d area were determined from an abdominal plain rr-ray. A plain x-ray o
f the kidneys, ureters and bladder was obtained in all patients at a m
edian followup of 12.3 and 8 months in the ureteroscopy and ESWL group
s respectively. Results: After initial therapy the overall stone-free
rate was 62 and 52% in the ureteroscopy and ESWL groups, respectively.
Stone-free status after ESWL was significantly related to each anatom
ical measurement. Infundibulopelvic angle 90 degrees or greater, and i
nfundibular length less than 3 cm. and width greater than 5 mm, were e
ach noted to correlate with an improved stone-free rate after ESWL. In
contrast, the stone-free rate after ureteroscopy was not statisticall
y significantly impacted by these anatomical features, although a clin
ical stone-free trend was identified relating to a favorable infundibu
lar length and infundibulopelvic angle. The infundibulopelvic angle wa
s 90 degrees or greater in 4 stone-free patients (12% overall), includ
ing 2 who underwent ureteroscopy and 2 who underwent ESWL. On the othe
r hand, in 2 and 4 stone-free patients (18% overall) who underwent ure
teroscopy and ESWL, respectively, favorable radiographic features cons
isted of a short, wide but acutely angulated infundibulum with the inf
undibulopelvic angle less than 90 degrees, and infundibular length les
s than 3 cm. and width 5 mm. or greater. In contrast, in 4 and 6 patie
nts (29% overall) who undenvent ureteroscopy and ESWL, respectively, a
ll 3 radiographic features were unfavorable with the infundibulopelvic
angle less than 90 degrees, and infundibular length greater than 3 cm
. and width less than 5 mm. In these cases the stone-free rate was 50
and 17% after ureteroscopy and ESWL, respectively. Conclusions: The 3
major radiographic features of the lower pole calix (infundibulopelvic
angle, and infundibular length and width) can be easily measured on s
tandard IVP using a ruler and protractor. Each factor individually has
a statistically significant-influence on stone clearance after ESWL.
A wide infundibulopelvic angle or short infundibular length and broad
infundibular width regardless of infundibulopelvic angle are significa
nt favorable factors for stone clearance following ESWL. Conversely, t
hese factors have a cumulatively negative effect on the stone clearanc
e rate after ESWL when they are all unfavorable. In ureteroscopy spati
al anatomy has less of a role in regard to stone clearance but it may
have a negative impact when there is uniformly unfavorable anatomy.