Purpose: We discuss conventional intestinal cystoplasty and show how c
oncern about potential complications has led to an interest in alterna
tive methods for cystoplasty, Techniques such as gastrocystoplasty, ur
eterocystoplasty, vesicomyomectomy (autoaugmentation), seromuscular au
gmentation, alloplastic replacement and bioprosthetic materials are re
viewed. Laboratory and clinical results of these techniques are examin
ed critically to compare advantages, disadvantages and potential appli
cations. Materials and Methods: Computer searches of available medical
data bases were used to generate a list of relevant publications, inc
luding original contributions and review articles, which were then rev
iewed, compared and summarized. Results: Augmentation cystoplasty is u
sed routinely for treatment of reduced bladder compliance and capacity
secondary to infectious, inflammatory, neurogenic and congenital diso
rders. Sigmoidocystoplasty and ileocystoplasty have became standard te
chniques but there is renewed interest in alternative techniques due t
o the relatively high morbidity of intestinal cystoplasty. Alternative
techniques have been described to avoid inclusion of intestinal mucos
a in the urinary tract while creating a compliant bladder of adequate
capacity. These techniques include gastrocystoplasty, vesicomyotomy, s
eromuscular augmentation, various alloplastic or biodegradable scaffol
ds and in vitro culture with subsequent grafting of autologous urothel
ium. Although encouraging animal and human results have been reported,
each technique is associated with its own limitations and disadvantag
es. Conclusions: While intestinal cystoplasty remains the standard, se
veral alternative techniques show promise. At present only gastrocysto
plasty, ureterocystoplasty and seromuscular augmentation should be con
sidered clinically useful.