Howell and Kintigh (1996) argue for ascribed leadership at Hawikku bas
ed on biological kinship within cemetery areas and nonrandom distribut
ion of higher-diversity burials. Their statistical evidence could be q
uestioned based on principles of two-tailed null hypotheses, the Bonfe
rroni principle, and other aspects. Especially when taking the bioanth
ropological literature more adequately into account, alternate conclus
ions somewhat at variance with Howell and Kintigh's concerning biologi
cal and social patterning according to gender could be envisioned.