BACTERIAL-INHIBITION TESTS USED TO SCREEN FOR ANTIMICROBIAL VETERINARY DRUG RESIDUES IN SLAUGHTERED ANIMALS

Citation
Go. Korsrud et al., BACTERIAL-INHIBITION TESTS USED TO SCREEN FOR ANTIMICROBIAL VETERINARY DRUG RESIDUES IN SLAUGHTERED ANIMALS, Journal of AOAC International, 81(1), 1998, pp. 21-24
Citations number
18
Categorie Soggetti
Chemistry Analytical","Food Science & Tenology
ISSN journal
10603271
Volume
81
Issue
1
Year of publication
1998
Pages
21 - 24
Database
ISI
SICI code
1060-3271(1998)81:1<21:BTUTSF>2.0.ZU;2-0
Abstract
Bacterial inhibition tests used to screen milk, tissues, blood, and ur ine for antimicrobial veterinary drug residues must be high volume, qu ick, rugged, inexpensive, and sensitive. Bacterial inhibition tests-su ch as the Swab Test on Premises (STOP), the Calf Antibiotic and Sulfa Test (CAST), the Fast Antibiotic Screen Test (FAST), the Charm Farm Te st (CFT), the Antimicrobial Inhibition Monitor 96 (AIM-96) assay, the German Three Plate Test, the European Union Four Plate Test and the Ne w Dutch Kidney Test-have been used to screen tissues for antimicrobial activity. The CFT and the Brilliant Black Reduction Test (BBRT) also have been used to screen plasma. The Live Animal Swab Test (LAST) was developed to screen urine. This review examines the use and limitation s of these screening tests for regulatory control and avoidance of vet erinary drug residues in meat. The ideal bacterial inhibition test for screening antimicrobial residues in slaughtered animals does not exis t. Each of the current and potential tests has limitations.