An. Thorndike et al., NATIONAL PATTERNS IN THE TREATMENT OF SMOKERS BY PHYSICIANS, JAMA, the journal of the American Medical Association, 279(8), 1998, pp. 604-608
Context.-Routine treatment of smokers by physicians is a national heal
th objective for the year 2000, a quality measure for health care plan
s, and the subject of evidence-based clinical guidelines. There are fe
w national data on how physicians' practices compare with these standa
rds. Objective.-To assess recent trends in the treatment of smokers by
US physicians in ambulatory care and to determine whether physicians'
practices meet current standards. Design.-Analysis of 1991-1995 data
from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, an annual survey of
a random sample of US office-based physicians. Setting.-Physicians' of
fices. Patients.-A total of 3254 physicians recorded data on 145716 ad
ult patient visits. Main Outcome Measures.-The proportion of visits at
which physicians (1) identified a patient's smoking status, (2) couns
eled a smoker to quit, and (3) used nicotine replacement therapy. Resu
lts.-Smoking counseling by physicians increased from 16% of smokers' v
isits in 1991 to 29% in 1993 (P<.001) and then decreased to 21% of smo
kers' visits in 1995 (P<.001). Nicotine replacement therapy use follow
ed a similar pattern, increasing from 0.4% of smokers' visits in 1991
to 2.2% in 1993 (P<.001) and decreasing to 1.3% of smokers' visits in
1995 (P=.007). Physicians identified patients' smoking status at 67% o
f all visits in 1991; this proportion did not increase overtime. Prima
ry care physicians were more likely to provide treatment to smokers th
an were specialists. All physicians were more likely to treat patients
with smoking-related diagnoses. Conclusions.-US physicians' treatment
of smokers improved little in the first half of the 1990s, although a
transient peak in counseling and nicotine replacement use occurred in
1993 after the introduction of the nicotine patch. Physicians' practi
ces fell far short of national health objectives and practice guidelin
es. In particular, patient visits for diagnoses not related to smoking
represent important missed opportunities for intervention.