Changes in forestry policy have increased the importance and extended
the scope of genetic management of native species. Recent debate on ge
netic management prescriptions has been conducted with insufficient ac
cess to sound scientific information. This paper attempts to remedy th
is by: (1) presenting an overview of genetic variation and the process
es which control it; (2) reviewing current measures; and (3) proposing
a range of improvements ti, policy and practice. Genetic variation in
Scottish tree and shrub populations is a neglected field of research,
except for Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris). Some useful information can
be provided by considering the history, ecology and biology of specie
s together with genetic theory. Current patterns of variation reflect
both the historical origins (as demonstrated by biochemical markers) a
nd adaptation through natural selection (as indicated by provenance re
search). Existing populations probably still retain significant elemen
ts of adaptive variation; though this will vary according to species,
with some showing close correlation between patterns of adaptive varia
tion and environmental factors and others being more plastic. Indigeno
us genepools have been modified by fragmentation, changes in the fores
t environment, and introduction of foreign material, much of which is
maladapted to upland sites. With some exceptions, the levels of geneti
c variation in existing indigenous populations comprise an adequate ba
sis for restoring and expanding native woodland. The current undiscrim
inating use of continental provenances needs to be strongly discourage
d; but equally restricting choice of seed sources to the most local pr
ovenances can also be inappropriate. Use of Scottish material from the
same region and similar site type as the planting site needs to be en
couraged. Current genetic management measures are rudimentary and fail
to address adequately key issues of provenance choice, genetic conser
vation, seed supply or provision of selected or improved material, esp
ecially in broadleaves. Changes in legislation, regulation, seed suppl
y, advice and research are proposed to address these shortcomings. The
need for more provenance research is highlighted.