In six experiments using the speeded classification paradigm, we provi
de evidence that the ostensibly ''separable'' dimensions of size and o
rientation can produce patterns of either separability or asymmetric c
onfigurality, depending on the spatial arrangement of the stimuli. In
all experiments, subjects classified large or small circles containing
a single Line in one of two possible orientations. When the line touc
hed the circle's perimeter, thereby defining the diameter of the circl
e (Experiments 1-4), asymmetric configurality obtained: Variations in
size interfered with classification by orientation, but variations in
orientation did not interfere with classification by size, and redunda
ncy gain was weak or absent. When the lines fell completely within (i.
e., did not touch) the circles (Experiments 5 and 6), the results were
consistent with separability: There was neither redundancy gain nor i
nterference. Taken together, the results add to the growing body of ev
idence that classification of specific dimensional pairs as separable
or integral may be less feasible than identifying the more general con
ditions that increase or decrease the psychological salience of dimens
ional structures and facilitate or interfere with selection of optimal
processing strategies.