A clinical trial of the Oticon DigiFocus hearing aid was performed. Th
e test aid was evaluated on 33 subjects with several years experience
as users of modem analog hearing aids. These aids were used as referen
ce for the 1-month-long trial. The Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid
Benefit (APHAB) showed a mean difference in benefit with superior rati
ngs for the test aid concerning ease of communication, speech in rever
beration and speech in background noise. The subjects' own aids were r
ated somewhat better concerning aversiveness of sounds, but this diffe
rence was not statistically significant. The Gothenburg Profile showed
a statistically significant difference between the test aid and the r
eference aids in favour of the test aid. The difference was most evide
nt with regard to speech communication and the effects of hearing loss
on social interactions. Sound quality ratings concerning clearness we
re significantly higher for the test aid. Speech recognition threshold
s in noise were on average 0.7 dB better for the test aids when tested
at speech levels 60 and 75 dB. The difference was statistically signi
ficant only at 75 dB. There was a significant interaction between gene
ral preference and hearing aid type, indicating that overall sound qua
lity was an important factor affecting the general preference for eith
er the test aid or the reference aid. Twenty-three subjects generally
preferred the test aid, six preferred their own aid and four stated no
difference.