D. Tsirakos et al., INVERSE OPTIMIZATION - FUNCTIONAL AND PHYSIOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS RELATED TO THE FORCE-SHARING PROBLEM, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering, 25(4-5), 1997, pp. 371-407
This paper is a review of the optimization techniques used for the sol
ution of the force-sharing problem in biomechanics; that is, the distr
ibution of the net joint moment to the force generating structures suc
h as muscles and ligaments. The solution to this problem is achieved b
y the minimization (or maximization) of an objective function that inc
ludes the design variables !usually muscle forces) that are subject to
certain constraints, and it is generally related to physiological or
mechanical properties such as muscle stress, maximum force or moment,
activation level, etc. The usual constraints require the sum of the ex
erted moments to be equal to the net joint moment and certain boundary
conditions restrict the force solutions within physiologically accept
able limits. Linear optimization (objective and constraint functions a
re both linear relationships) has limited capabilities for the solutio
n of the force sharing problem, although the use of appropriate constr
aints and physiologically realistic boundary conditions can improve th
e solution and lead to reasonable and functionally acceptable muscle f
orce predictions. Nonlinear optimization provides more physiologically
acceptable results, especially when the criteria used are related to
the dynamics of the movement (e.g., instantaneous maximum force derive
d from muscle: modeling based on length and velocity histories). The e
valuation of predicted forces can be performed using direct measuremen
ts of forces (usually in animals), relationship with EMG patterns, com
parisons with forces obtained from optimized forward dynamics, and by
evaluating the results using analytical solutions of the optimal probl
em to highlight muscle synergism for example. Global objective functio
ns are more restricting compared to local ones that are related to the
specific objective of the movement at its different phases (e.g., max
imize speed or minimize pain). In complex dynamic activities multiobje
ctive optimization is likely to produce more realistic results.