T. Hirai et al., 3-DIMENSIONAL FISP IMAGING IN THE EVALUATION OF CAROTID-CAVERNOUS FISTULA - COMPARISON WITH CONTRAST-ENHANCED CT AND SPIN-ECHO MR, American journal of neuroradiology, 19(2), 1998, pp. 253-259
Citations number
21
Categorie Soggetti
Clinical Neurology","Radiology,Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the value of three-di
mensional fast imaging with steady-state precession (FISP) MR sequence
s relative to contrast-enhanced CT and spin-echo MR imaging in the dia
gnosis of carotid cavernous fistula (CCF), METHODS: Seventeen patients
with 19 angiographically proved CCFs had contrast-enhanced CT, spin-e
cho MR imaging, and 3-D FISP imaging. Three observers assessed these i
maging studies as well as those of 43 control sides in a blinded manne
r for the presence or absence of CCF, Receiver operating characteristi
c analysis was used to assess the diagnostic utility of each imaging t
echnique. In a nonblinded study, contrast-enhanced 3-D FISP images wer
e also evaluated, RESULTS: Higher diagnostic accuracy was obtained wit
h 3-D FISP sequences, as the shunt flow within the cavernous sinus was
well seen, Sensitivity of 3-D FISP images was 83% and specificity was
100% in the blinded study, In the receiver operating characteristic a
nalysis, the diagnostic performance of observers was found to be bette
r with the 3-D FISP images than with the spin-echo MR images. Although
there were no significant difference between 3-D FISP and contrast-en
hanced CT, higher diagnostic performance was obtained with 3-D FISP im
ages, In three CCFs without anterior drainage, a diagnosis was made on
ly from the 3-D FISP images, The contrast-enhanced 3-D FISP images wer
e not helpful, since the cavernous sinuses enhanced. CONCLUSION: Three
-dimensional FISP imaging is superior to spin-echo MR imaging and cont
rast-enhanced CT in the diagnosis of CCF. Contrast-enhanced 3-D FISP i
mages are not helpful for the evaluation of CCF.