Y. Takao et al., IS AGE RELEVANT TO FUNCTIONAL OUTCOME AFTER RESTORATIVE PROCTOCOLECTOMY FOR ULCERATIVE-COLITIS - PROSPECTIVE ASSESSMENT OF 122 CASES, Annals of surgery, 227(2), 1998, pp. 187-194
Objective Restorative proctocolectomy for mucosal ulcerative colitis i
s well established. However, the effect of age on physiologic sphincte
r parameters is poorly understood. Our objective was to determine whet
her age at the time of restorative proctocolectomy correlates with phy
siologic changes. Summary Background Data In the approximately 20 year
s during which restorative proctocolectomy has been performed for ulce
rative colitis, the indications have changed. initially, the procedure
was recommended only in patients under approximately 50 years. Howeve
r, the procedure has been considered in older patients because of the
increasing age of our population, the increasing frequency of recognit
ion of patients during the ''second peak'' of mucosal ulcerative colit
is, and the decreasing morbidity rates, due to the learning curve and
to newer techniques, such as double-stapling. Few authors have present
ed data analyzing the effects of this operation in older patients. Met
hods One hundred twenty-two patients who had undergone a two-stage res
torative proctocolectomy for mucosal ulcerative colitis were divided i
nto three groups according to age: group I (>80 years), 11 men, 6 wome
n; group II (40-80 years), 29 men, 18 women; and group III (<40 years)
29 men, 29 women. The patients were prospectively evaluated using ana
l manometry and subjective functional results. Comparisons were made b
efore surgery, after colectomy and before closure of ileostomy, and at
1 or more years after surgery. Results There were no significant diff
erences among the groups relative to manometric results, frequency of
bowel movements, incontinence scores, or overall patient satisfaction.
The postoperative mean and maximum resting pressures were significant
ly reduced (p < 0.001), and conversely the sensory threshold (p < 0.00
5) and capacity (p < 0.001) were increased in all groups up to 1 year
after surgery. There were no statistically significant changes in the
squeeze pressure or length of the high-pressure zone in any group at a
ny point in lime. After surgery, the mean and maximum resting pressure
s had returned to 80% of their original values. Conclusion Although an
orectal function is transiently somewhat impaired after restorative pr
octocolectomy, the impairment is not an age-related phenomenon.