Wd. Jordan et al., A COST COMPARISON OF BALLOON ANGIOPLASTY AND STENTING VERSUS ENDARTERECTOMY FOR THE TREATMENT OF CAROTID-ARTERY STENOSIS, Journal of vascular surgery, 27(1), 1998, pp. 16-22
Purpose: Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty with stenting (PTAS) of
the carotid artery has been advocated as an alternative treatment for
high-grade stenosis. Rationale for this approach includes less morbid
ity, shorter recovery, and lower cost when compared with carotid endar
terectomy (CEA). Methods: The clinical results and hospital charges of
patients who underwent elective treatment for carotid stenosis were r
eviewed. During a concurrent 14-month period, 218 patients were admitt
ed 229 times for 234 procedures for the treatment of 239 carotid bifur
cation stenoses, 109 by PTAS and 130 by CEA. Hospital charges were rev
iewed for each hospitalization and were categorized according to radio
logy, operating room, cardiac catheterization laboratory, and all othe
r hospital charges. Results: The combined incidence of postprocedure s
trokes and deaths were: PTAS, eight strokes (7.7%) and one death (0.9%
); CEA, two strokes (1.5%) and two deaths (1.5%). Total hospital charg
es per admission for the two groups were $30,140 for PTAS and $21,670
for CEA. The average postprocedure length of stay for PTAS was 2.9 day
s (median, 2 days) and for CEA was 3.1 days (median, 3 days). Cardiac
catheterization laboratory charges for the PTAS group were $12,968, wh
ereas the operating room charges for the CEA group were $4263. When ho
spitalizations that were extended by complications were excluded, the
average total charges for the PTAS group (n = 84) dropped to $24,848 (
mean length of stay, 1.9 days) and for the CEA group (n = 111) to $19,
247 (mean length of stay 2.6 days). Conclusions: After evaluating hosp
ital charges, PTAS for the treatment of carotid stenosis cannot curren
tly be justified on the basis of reduced costs alone. With future cost
-containing measures, total hospital charges can be reduced in both gr
oups. (J Vasc Surg 1998;27:16-24.).