Ma. Bennett et al., ALKENE COMPLEXES OF DIVALENT AND TRIVALENT RUTHENIUM STABILIZED BY CHELATION - DEPENDENCE OF COORDINATED ALKENE ORIENTATION ON METAL OXIDATION-STATE, Journal of the American Chemical Society, 120(5), 1998, pp. 932-941
Zinc amalgam reduction of tris (acetylacetonato)ruthenium(III), [Ru(ac
ac)(3)], in the presence of the chelating olefinic N- and O-donor liga
nds (LL') 2-vinyl-N,N-dimethylaniline, o-CH2=CHC6H4NMe2 (1), 2-isoprop
enyl-N,N-dimethylaniline, o-CH2=C(CH3)C6H4NMe2 (2), 3-butenyldimethyla
mine, CH2=CHCH2CH2NMe2 (3), 2-allylpyridine, CH2=CHCH2C5H4N (4), isome
sityl oxide (4-methyl-4-penten-2-one), CH2=C(CH3)CH2COCH3 (5), 2-metho
xystyrene, o-CH2=CHC6H4OMe (6), and 3-butenylmethyl ether, CH2=CHCH2CH
2OCH3 (7) gives the corresponding bis(acetylacetonato)ruthenium(II) co
mplexes [Ru(acac)(2)(LL')] (8-14). These undergo one-electron oxidatio
n by cyclic voltammetry to the corresponding cations [Ru(acac)(2)(LL')
](+), the process being reversible at both room temperature and -60 de
grees C. The cations were isolated as deep blue, paramagnetic PF6 or S
bF6 salts from the oxidation of the ruthenium(II) precursors 8-12 and
14 with Ag+ or [FeCp2](+) salts; they are the first stable alkene comp
lexes of ruthenium(III). At both oxidation levels, coordination of the
prochiral alkene gives rise to a pair of diastereomers, labeled a, b
at the Ru(II) level, a(+), b(+) at the Ru(III) level, whose redox pote
ntials E-1/2 (Ru3+/2+) differ by ca. 100 mV. The equilibrium a/b ratio
at the Ru(II) level is ca. 1:9, although for 8, 10, and 11 this is es
tablished only after several hours at ca. 100 degrees C, the ratio in
the complexes immediately after isolation being ca. 2:3. Selective rem
oval of the more easily oxidized diastereomer of the 2-vinyl-N,N-dimet
hylaniline complex 8a by treatment of a 2:3 mixture with ca. 0.5 equiv
of Ag+ provides pure 8b, which undergoes reversible one-electron oxid
ation at -60 degrees C to 8b(+). Above -10 degrees C, 8b+ isomerizes t
o an equilibrium mixture (ca. 85:15) of 8a(+) and 8b(+), as shown by U
V-visible spectroelectrochemistry. Thus, both diastereomeric preferenc
e and rate of interconversion are strongly dependent on the oxidation
state (number of metal d-electrons). The metrical parameters pertainin
g to alkene coordination in the diastereomers 8a and 8b do not differ
significantly, the metal-carbon distances being 2.159(4), 2.144(4) Ang
strom (8a), 2.142(2), 2.153(3) Angstrom (8b) and the C=C distances bei
ng 1.383(5) Angstrom (8a) and 1.382(4) Angstrom (8b). The correspondin
g distances in the Ru(III) complex [8a](+)[SbF6](-) [Ru-C=2.239(6), 2.
236(7) Angstrom; C=C = 1.355(9) A] indicate that the alkene is more we
akly bound than in either of its diastereomeric Ru(II) precursors.