Js. Heldt et al., EVALUATION OF WHEAT MIDDLINGS AS A SUPPLEMENT FOR BEEF-COWS GRAZING NATIVE WINTER RANGE WITH DIFFERING FORAGE AVAILABILITIES, Journal of animal science, 76(2), 1998, pp. 378-387
We conducted two studies to compare wheat middlings as a low-protein,
highly digestible fiber supplement to soybean meal and corn-soybean me
al supplement for cows grazing winter range. In two 60-d winter grazin
g trials (December to February) cows (BW 500 kg) were allotted by age
and weight to a 2 x 4 factorial with two forage availabilities and fou
r supplements. Cows received either soybean meal (SBM), corn-soybean m
eal (CS), low wheat middlings (LWM), or high wheat middlings (HWM). Th
e SBM and LWM supplements were formulated to provide the same daily CP
, and CS and HWM provided the same daily CP and ME. In a 4 x 4 Latin s
quare, four ruminally fistulated steers (BW 765 kg) received the same
supplements and had free access to mature prairie hay. Cows grazing th
e high forage pasture gained more (P < .01) weight than cows grazing t
he low forage pasture. Cows supplemented with HWM gained less weight (
P = .05) than cows supplemented with a similar amount of CP and ME fro
m CS. Weight change of cows receiving SBM or LWM was similar. Increasi
ng the amount of wheat middlings from LWM to HWM increased weight chan
ge (P = .04). In Exp. 2, SBM and LWM: had similar total digestible DMI
(DDMI). Steers supplemented with CS had higher total (P = .08) DDMI t
han HWM. Supplementation with HWM resulted in lower total (P = .02) DD
MI than LWM. Response to SBM and LWM was similar. The CS and HWM resul
ted in beneficial performance responses as well as increasing the leve
l of wheat middlings from low to high.