A major challenge in Earth system studies is mapping vegetation quanti
ties over large regions. Aspatial regression is typically the empirica
l method applied to remotely sensed and ground data for the spatial pr
ediction of vegetation variables. Geostatistical methods, such as cokr
iging and stochastic simulation, have rarely been used for this purpos
e. A synthetic example was constructed from imaging spectrometer data
to allow an objective comparison between regression, cokriging and a n
ew stochastic simulation method. A range of linear relations between g
round sample data and image data was represented in the example. The l
owest root-mean-square-error was achieved with cokriging until the cor
relation coefficient (r) between direct and ancillary data exceeded 0.
89, at which point regression was the more accurate predictor. Probabi
lity-field simulation gave a range of possible realizations, overall l
ess accurate than those from regression but more faithful to the histo
gram and spatial pattern of the variable to be predicted. The strength
of the relation between ground measurements and image data was shown
to be a critical factor in choosing a spatial prediction method.