Background. Although there is an increasing incidence of proximal gast
ric cancers in the United States, the appropriate extent of resection
for proximal gastric cancer is not known. This study addresses whether
the type of operation (total gastrectomy [TC] vs proximal gastrectomy
[PG]) affects outcome for proximal gastric adenocarcinoma. Methods. R
eview of the prospective gastric database at Memorial Sloan-Kettering
Cancer Center from July 1985 to August 1995 identified 391 patients wi
th proximal gastric cancer Of those patients, 98 underwent curative TG
or PG through an exclusively abdominal approach. Patients undergoing
esophagogastrectomy (n = 283) were excluded fi-om analysis. Data are e
xpressed as medians and ranges. Results. The length of hospital stay w
as the same for patients undergoing resection for PG (16.5 days [range
8 to 55]) and for TG (18 days [range 8 to 48]). In addition, hospital
mortality rates for PG (6.0%) were similar to those for TG (3.0%). Th
ere was no significant difference in tumor differentiation and overall
stage between the groups that underwent TG and those that underwent P
G. There was no significant difference in time to recurrence between t
he two operative groups (PG, 15.7 months, versus TG, 18 months). In ad
dition, there was no association between first site of recurrence and
type of procedure. The overall 5-year survival rate for proximal gastr
ic cancer was 43% (median survival 46 months), whereas the 5-year surv
ival rate for TG was 41 % (median survival 51 months,. difference not
significant). Conclusions. The extent of resection for proximal gastri
c cancer does not affect long-term outcome. TG and PG have similar ove
rall survival rates and time and rate of recurrence, and both procedur
es can be accomplished safely.