Ea. Beierle et al., GASTROINTESTINAL PERFORATION AFTER PEDIATRIC ORTHOTOPIC LIVER-TRANSPLANTATION, Journal of pediatric surgery, 33(2), 1998, pp. 240-242
Purpose: The aim of this review was to determine the incidence of gast
rointestinal perforation after pediatric liver transplantation and to
identify risk factors and clinical indicators that may lead to an earl
ier diagnosis. Methods: A retrospective chart review of all children w
ho presented with gastrointestinal perforation after liver transplanta
tion at our institution between January 1, 1987 and August 1, 1996 was
performed. Results: One hundred fifty-seven orthotopic liver transpla
nts were performed in 128 children. Fifty-eight reexplorations, exclud
ing those for retransplantation, were performed in 38 children. Ten pe
rforations occurred in six children (incidence, 6.4%). Two children re
quired multiple reexplorations because of several episodes of perforat
ion. The sites of perforation were duodenum (n = 1), jejunum (n = 8),
and ileum (n = 1). A single-layer closure was used to repair five perf
orations, two-layer closures in four, and resection with primary anast
omosis in another. The type of repair did not affect the occurrence of
subsequent perforations. All the children were less than 18 months ol
d. Four children had undergone prior laparotomy. All children had chol
edochoenteric anastomoses, but only one had a perforation associated w
ith it. One child sustained bower injury during the dissection for the
liver transplant, but none of the perforations occurred at this site.
Bowel function had returned before perforation in five children. Five
children were receiving systemic antibiotics at the time of their per
foration, and none had been dosed with pulse steroids for rejection. A
ll of the children had significant changes in their temperature. Acute
leukopenia developed in one child. A leukocytosis developed in the re
st of the children. Abdominal radiographs demonstrated pneumoperitoneu
m in only one child. All children had positive culture findings from t
heir abdominal drains. Cytomegalovirus developed in one child. Althoug
h the diagnosis of gastrointestinal perforation after pediatric liver
transplant remains difficult, positive drain culture findings and sign
ificant alterations in temperature and leukocyte counts suggest its pr
esence. Pneumoperitoneum is rarely present. Conclusion: A high index o
f suspicion and timely laparotomy, especially in children less than 2
years of age, may be the only way to rapidly diagnose and treat this p
otentially devastating complication of liver transplant. Copyright (C)
1998 by W.B. Saunders Company.