Over the past 20 yr, increased attention has been directed toward eval
uation of urinary enzymes as markers of nephrotoxicity in dogs because
the technique is noninvasive and considered to be more sensitive than
the more commonly used conventional tests of renal function. Urinary
enzymes also have the potential of determining the primary site of ren
al damage because different sections of the nephron have a characteris
tic complement of enzymes. In dogs, increases in brush border enzymes,
including gamma-glutamyl transferase and alkaline phosphatase, have b
een associated with renal proximal tubular damage, while increases in
N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase have been observed in the early stage
of renal papillary necrosis. Urinary enzymes have been particularly us
eful in detection of acute renal damage in dogs, Specifically tubular
damage; however, their corresponding value in providing information ab
out chronic renal damage remains to be established. Although elevation
of certain enzymes appears to be a relatively sensitive measure of ne
phrotoxicity in the dog, there is no current agreement regarding which
enzyme assays are the most appropriate for routine use in safety asse
ssment studies. In addition, elevation of a single enzyme is of limite
d diagnostic value in detection of renal damage because spurious incre
ases in urinary enzymes sometimes occur in normal dogs. Therefore, if
one wishes to conduct special assessment of nephrotoxicity in dogs, ev
aluation of several enzymes at multiple time points is needed to compe
nsate for normal enzyme variation and to identify potential anatomic s
ite selectivity of the toxin.