The World Bank - given its visibility, resources, prestige and leverag
e - is, in course of time, capable of distorting the word 'governance'
to make it acquire the kind of ideology-laden, question-begging conno
tation which it has injected into it. If this goes uncontested, debate
on governance will be marginalised by being confined to the narrow an
d warped terms set for it by the Worm Bank. This has already happened
with 'economic reforms' and 'structural adjustment', two other mantras
in the World Bank's vocabulary.