F. Antonaci et al., PRESSURE ALGOMETRY IN HEALTHY-SUBJECTS - INTER-EXAMINER VARIABILITY, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine, 30(1), 1998, pp. 3-8
The purpose of this study was to estimate inter-examiner reliability o
f head and neck algometry, Pain perception thresholds were assessed wi
th a mechanical pressure algometer in 21 healthy individuals, Threshol
ds were assessed at 13 symmetrical points on each side of the head and
neck, at the deltoid muscle and at the median finger, The pressure ra
nge of the instrument proved insufficient to study the pain perception
threshold on the finger, however, Two different examiners carried out
one or two examinations in each subject during one day, The sequence
of investigations was varied randomly, The inter-examiner reliability
was found to be good, with a mean intra-class correlation coefficient
(ICC) of 0.75, Intra-examiner reproducibility was excellent (mean ICC=
0.84). The mean inter-examiner coefficient of variation was 18.7%, whi
le the mean coefficient of repeatability (CR) was 1.60 kg/cm(2), In co
mparison, the mean intra-examiner coefficient of variation was 15% whi
le the mean CR was 1.29 kg/cm(2), Statistically significant difference
s between examiners were found for the frontal point (p<0.01), while a
trend towards lower thresholds in one of the two observers was seen i
n 10 of the 13 non-significant points, Inter-examiner reliability of s
ide differences was excellent, with CR=1.23 kg/cm(2). In conclusion, m
anual algometry with a rather inexpensive mechanical device has a good
to excellent inter-rater reliability, When studying patients, however
, the possible bias introduced by different examiners should be taken
into account, both regarding study design and data analysis.