S. Mcbride et al., HUMAN LUNG-CARCINOMA CELL-LINE DLKP CONTAINS 3 DISTINCT SUBPOPULATIONS WITH DIFFERENT GROWTH AND ATTACHMENT PROPERTIES, Tumor biology, 19(2), 1998, pp. 88-103
Many human solid tumours, particularly lung tumours, contain different
subpopulations. the presence of which can complicate diagnosis and tr
eatment, yet few models exist for in vitro studies. We have found that
DLKP, a human lung cell line established from a tumour histologically
diagnosed as a 'poorly differentiated squamous carcinoma', contains 3
morphologically distinct populations. Three clones corresponding to t
hese populations were established from the parental DLKP cells. Confir
mation that the clones were derived from the parental population was o
btained by DNA fingerprinting. The clones were designated M (mesenchym
allike), I (intermediate) and SQ (squamous), On prolonged subculture,
SQ and M can each interconvert with I, but SQ and M do not interconver
t. We investigated the growth patterns of these isolated populations i
n monolayer culture, soft agar, spinner flasks and serum-free medium,
In all but the latter assay, the parental DLKP cells grew faster than
each of the clones, indicating some form of physiological co-operation
between the clones. The growth of the clones themselves varied under
the different assay conditions (DLKP-I showing greatest growth in mono
layer, in serum-containing and serum-free media but, surprisingly, bei
ng unable to grow in soft agar, unlike the SQ and hi clones), Addition
of fibronectin permitted growth of DLKP-M and DLKP-SQ in serum-free m
edium at equivalent rates to those of DLKP and DLKP-I, In some cases,
morphological adaptation to specific growth conditions was observed. V
ariation between the clones was also evident in their respective chrom
osome numbers (with the hi clone being predominantly hyperdiploid and
the other clones predominantly hypertetraploid) and in their ability t
o adhere to extracellular matrix proteins, with DLKP-M showing most ra
pid attachment. Electrical resistance studies revealed the absence of
tight junctions from the parental line and clonal subpopulations, Exte
nsive immunohistological studies showed that neither DLKP nor the clon
es express cytokeratin or any other epithelial marker examined, but ne
uroendocrine markers were present. Further analysis of these different
clonal populations may help to reveal some of the mechanisms involved
in lung tumour development and progression.