Quantitative networks of trophic exchanges offer the potential to comp
are food webs from neighboring ecosystems in order to ascertain whethe
r large differences and similarities exist in trophic structure and fu
nction. Network analysis was invoked to compare the exchanges of carbo
n in 3 mid-Atlantic estuaries on the eastern U.S. coast: the Narragans
ett, Delaware, and Chesapeake Bays. Narragansett Bay exhibited the hig
hest average annual rate of net primary production, followed by Delawa
re and Chesapeake Bays. Taken in combination, the analyses of cycling
structures (magnitude of flows, average carbon cycle lengths), organiz
ation of carbon flows, system production:biomass ratios, and harvest r
ates all indicated that the Delaware and Chesapeake Bay ecosystems are
more stressed than that of Narragansett Bay. To differentiate between
the former two, a combination of measures of system efficiency, cycli
ng structure, and food web connectivity was employed. The results indi
cated that Delaware Bay is currently less impacted and has potentially
more ability to mitigate perturbations to its food web than does Ches
apeake Bay. Overall, network analysis proved to be a suitable methodol
ogy for making inter-estuarine ecosystem comparisons, and for providin
g useful insights to natural resource managers in the assessment of es
tuarine trophic structure and status.