In recent years, a number of new techniques have been developed-includ
ing deliberative polls and educational surveys-that attempt to gather
measures of public opinion that is of higher quality (i.e. better info
rmed or more deliberative) than that recorded in typical mass opinion
surveys. This paper addresses several general sets of questions. What
is meant by 'quality' in public opinion? What criteria can be enumerat
ed by which the quality of public opinion can be assessed? In grapplin
g with these questions, the paper argues that conceptions of quality i
n public opinion are inextricably bound to broader conceptions of qual
ity in democratic decision making, a complex process involving multipl
e phases and collective participants. In addition, a number of importa
nt contradictions and ambiguities underlie conceptions of quality in p
ublic opinion.