Azb. Latif et al., TREATMENT BY A SPECIALIST SURGICAL NEURO-ONCOLOGIST DOES NOT PROVIDE ANY SURVIVAL ADVANTAGE FOR PATIENTS WITH A MALIGNANT GLIOMA, British journal of neurosurgery, 12(1), 1998, pp. 29-32
To determine whether patients with malignant glioma (glioblastoma and
anaplastic astrocytoma) had longer survival times, and lower morbidity
and mortality if operated on by a surgical neuro-oncologist rather th
an a general neurosurgeon the outcomes of 236 patients managed within
a university surgical neurology department were analysed. Although bot
h surgical morbidity (8.9 versus 11.8%) and mortality (3.6 versus 8.8%
) were lower following surgery by the specialist neuro-oncologist neit
her difference was statistically significant. Crude outcome data sugge
sted patients operated upon by a specialist surgical neuro-oncologist
survived longer (p = 0.067). However, after adjustment for case mix (t
ype of tumour, year of treatment, MRC prognostic index) using multiple
logistic regression and a hazards model, there was no difference in o
utcome (p = 0.46, HR 0.884, 95% CI 0.659-1.22). This retrospective stu
dy (i) suggests that other outcome measures are required to validate s
pecialist surgical neuro-oncologist treatment of patients with maligna
nt glioma; and (ii) confirms the importance of adjustment for case mix
when comparing non-randomized treatment outcomes.