RECONFIGURING THE ARMS-RACE WAR DEBATE

Citation
Pf. Diehl et Mjc. Crescenzi, RECONFIGURING THE ARMS-RACE WAR DEBATE, Journal of peace research, 35(1), 1998, pp. 111-118
Citations number
22
Categorie Soggetti
International Relations
Journal title
ISSN journal
00223433
Volume
35
Issue
1
Year of publication
1998
Pages
111 - 118
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-3433(1998)35:1<111:RTAWD>2.0.ZU;2-#
Abstract
A recent article by Susan Sample purports to resolve a debate that has generated a great deal of scholarly attention over the past two decad es, whether arms races are associated with the escalation of militariz ed disputes to war. In response, we outline a research agenda designed to reconfigure the arms race-war debate rather than to perpetuate the controversy We argue for better theoretical specification of the arms race-war relationship, and for empirical tests to sort out whether th is relationship is direct, indirect, or spurious. We also advocate som e methodological changes including more longitudinal studies, a broade r spatial domain to include minor powers, less reliance on military ex penditure data, and multivariate (rather than bivariate) rests of the arms race-war relationship.