A recent article by Susan Sample purports to resolve a debate that has
generated a great deal of scholarly attention over the past two decad
es, whether arms races are associated with the escalation of militariz
ed disputes to war. In response, we outline a research agenda designed
to reconfigure the arms race-war debate rather than to perpetuate the
controversy We argue for better theoretical specification of the arms
race-war relationship, and for empirical tests to sort out whether th
is relationship is direct, indirect, or spurious. We also advocate som
e methodological changes including more longitudinal studies, a broade
r spatial domain to include minor powers, less reliance on military ex
penditure data, and multivariate (rather than bivariate) rests of the
arms race-war relationship.