We conducted two types of experiments to assess the validity of the H-
reflex recovery test, using double stimulation to test soleus motoneur
on pool excitability in healthy and spastic subjects, One type dealt w
ith the mechanical effect of the conditioning H reflex on the ankle jo
int; the other type with the effect of change in reflex size, The mech
anical effect was tested both with the ankle joint fixed (FX) and free
to move (FR). Differences between FX and FR conditions commenced with
relaxation of soleus muscle contraction by the conditioning H reflex.
In the FR condition, abrupt facilitation occurred, and changed to mar
ked depression, We conclude that specific facilitation and inhibition
in the FR condition were secondary effects of group la inflows caused
by the ankle extensor muscle stretching on relaxation. In some spastic
patients as well as in controls, facilitation due to the mechanical e
ffect in the FR condition was observed despite the FX condition. The e
ffects of systematic changes on soleus H-reflex size were investigated
at conditioning-test intervals of 80 ms, so as to avoid mechanical ef
fects. When conditioning and test reflexes were the same size, the amo
unt of recovery increased as the H-reflex size increased. Comparison o
f the relation between amount of recovery and H-reflex size, expressed
as a percentage of Mmax, showed no significant difference between the
two groups. We speculate that the stronger recovery of spasticity men
tioned in previous literature may have resulted from the fact that rel
atively greater H reflexes were tested in those studies. In conclusion
, the present study indicates that double stimulation is not appropria
te for assessing spinal motoneuron pool ''excitability increase'' in s
pasticity. (C) 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.