One of the more natural but less commonly studied forms of colonial ba
cterial growth is pattern formation. This type of growth is characteri
zed by bacterial populations behaving in an organized manner to genera
te readily identifiable geometric and predictable morphologies on soli
d and semi-solid surfaces. In our first attempt to study the molecular
basis of pattern formation in Bacillus subtilis, we stumbled upon an
enigma: some strains used to describe pattern formation in B. subtilis
did not have the phenotypic or genotypic characteristics of B. subtil
is. In this report, we show that these strains are actually not B. sub
tilis, but belong to a different class of Bacilli, group I. We show fu
rther that commonly used laboratory strains of B. subtilis can co-exis
t as mixed cultures with group I Bacilli, and that the latter go unnot
iced when grown on frequently used laboratory substrates. However, whe
n B. subtilis is grown under more stringent semiarid conditions, membe
rs of group I emerge in the form of complex patterns. When B. subtilis
is grown under less stringent and more motile conditions, B. subtilis
forms its own pattern, and members of group I remain unnoticed. These
findings have led us to revise some of the mechanistic and evolutiona
ry hypotheses that have been proposed to explain pattern growth in Bac
illi.