Contemporary empirical studies of teamwork take much of their inspirat
ion from long-standing conflicting images of 'good' work in modern soc
ieties. In particular, the 'machine', 'anomie' and 'alienation' images
have had a strong influence on theoretical development and empirical
research. Rather than criticizing the dominance of this imagery, this
article argues for a more self-conscious and comprehensive exploitatio
n of its richness and diversity. Contemporary studies of teamwork are
more often than not held back by a reduction of fundamental theoretica
l issues and tensions to matters of simple empirical tests and a 'forc
ed' choice between perspectives and a general decline in attention to
the 'alienation' image. The argument herein is made through a reanalys
is of the classic and exemplary debate between Adler and Cole and Berg
gren over teamwork in NUMMI and Uddevalla.