P. Shrager et al., NERVE-CONDUCTION BLOCK BY NITRIC-OXIDE THAT IS MEDIATED BY THE AXONALENVIRONMENT, Journal of neurophysiology, 79(2), 1998, pp. 529-536
Conduction in rat peripheral nerve has been monitored following the st
imulated release of nitric oxide (NO) from diethylamine-NONOate (DEA-N
ONOate). Branches of the sciatic nerve were dissected, but left otherw
ise intact, and propagating signals recorded externally. At levels con
sistent with inflammation, NO exposure resulted in a complete loss of
the compound action potential. Conduction was fully restored on remova
l of the drug. Most notably, this loss of excitability was dependent o
n the axonal environment. Removal of the connective tissue sheaths sur
rounding the nerve bundle, a process that normally enhances drug actio
n, prevented block of signal propagation by nitric oxide. The epineuri
um seemed not to be required, and the decreased susceptibility to NO a
ppeared to be correlated with a gradual loss of a component of the end
oneurium that surrounds individual fibers. Tested on the rat vagus ner
ve, NO eliminated action potentials in both myelinated and unmyelinate
d fibers. One chemical mechanism that is consistent with the reversibi
lity of block and the observed lack of effect of 8-Br-cGMP on conducti
on is the formation of a nitrosothiol through reaction of NO with a su
lfhydryl group. In contrast to DEA-NONOate, S-nitrosocysteine, which c
an both transfer nitrosonium cation (NO+) to another thiol and also re
lease nitric oxide, was effective on both intact and desheathed prepar
ations. It has previously been demonstrated that chemical modification
of invertebrate axons by sulfhydryl-reactive compounds induces a slow
inactivation of Na+ channels. Nitric oxide block of axonal conduction
may contribute to clinical deficits in inflammatory diseases of the n
ervous system.