ESTIMATION OF THE PULMONARY CAPILLARY WEDGE PRESSURE FROM TRANSESOPHAGEAL PULSED DOPPLER-ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY OF PULMONARY VENOUS FLOW - INFLUENCE OF THE RESPIRATORY CYCLE DURING MECHANICAL VENTILATION
F. Girard et al., ESTIMATION OF THE PULMONARY CAPILLARY WEDGE PRESSURE FROM TRANSESOPHAGEAL PULSED DOPPLER-ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY OF PULMONARY VENOUS FLOW - INFLUENCE OF THE RESPIRATORY CYCLE DURING MECHANICAL VENTILATION, Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia, 12(1), 1998, pp. 16-21
Citations number
20
Categorie Soggetti
Anesthesiology,"Peripheal Vascular Diseas","Cardiac & Cardiovascular System
Objective:Pulsed Doppler measurement of pulmonary venous flow (PVF) in
the left superior pulmonary vein has been suggested as a noninvasive
method to evaluate pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP). In previ
ous studies, PVF was measured at end-expiration, and it is unknown to
what extent PVF is affected by the respiratory cycle. It is hypothesiz
ed that phasic variations of PVF during mechanical ventilation may be
used to estimate PCWP. Design: Prospective clinical study. Setting: Te
rtiary care university hospital. Participants: Thirty patients undergo
ing elective cardiac surgery. Interventions: At multiple intervals dur
ing the surgery, the PVF was measured with transesophageal pulsed Dopp
ler echocardiography, and measurements of PCWP and airway pressure wer
e simultaneously obtained. Measurements and Results: Components of PVF
evaluated were the systolic (X), diastolic (Y), and atrial (Z) waves
with their velocity-time integrals (VTI). The systolic fraction (SF =
VTI X/[VTI X + VTI Y]) and respiratory variations of each component of
PVF were determined and compared with PCWP. There was a greater respi
ratory variation of the X wave (X expiratory-X inspiratory/X expirator
y) in patients with PCWP <18 mmHg than in patients with PCWP greater t
han or equal to 18 mmHg (0.19 +/- 0.19 v 0.14 +/- 0.13, respectively,
p < 0.01). PVF components measured at end-expiration that related best
with PCWP were the X/Y peak velocities (r = -0.53), VTI X/VTI Y ratio
(r = -0.42), and the SF (r = -0.49). When measured during end-inspira
tion. the relation of the X/Y ratio, VTI X/VTI Y,and SF with the PCWP
were r = -0.54, r = -0.41, and r = -0.50, respectively. Conclusions: I
t has been documented that PVF velocity is influenced by the respirato
ry cycle during mechanical ventilation in patients undergoing cardiac
surgery, and the magnitude of this variation is influenced by PCWP. Ho
wever, it is not actually possible to predict PCWP accurately using th
ese findings. Further studies are needed in which preload is varied ac
utely to confirm the usefulness of the results. Copyright (C) 1998 by
W.B. Saunders Company.