Df. Capes et D. Asiimwe, PERFORMANCE OF SELECTED FLOW-RESTRICTING INFUSION DEVICES, American journal of health-system pharmacy, 55(4), 1998, pp. 351-359
The flow rate accuracy and flow continuity of the Homepump, Infusor, I
ntermate, Paragon, Sidekick, and Springfusor 10 flow-restricting infus
ion devices were studied. Three of each device were tested in a temper
ature-controlled cabinet at the manufacturer-specified operating tempe
rature and at 20 and 30 degrees C. The flow rates used were 100 mL/hr
and the rate that would provide a 24-hour delivery of fluid, except in
the case of the Springfusor 10, which was tested at the maximum and m
inimum flow rates. Flow rate was measured gravimetrically at 30-second
intervals. The endpoint of infusion was defined as the start of the t
erminal-phase decline. The effect of refrigerated storage was studied
by using the Intermate as an example of the elastomeric devices tested
. All devices exhibited a variable flow profile during infusion except
for the Paragon, which had a near-constant flow throughout. The avera
ge error in flow rate was within the manufacturer's specifications whe
n the devices were used under the manufacturer-specified operating con
ditions for all devices except for the Sidekick. The definition of the
endpoint made little difference in the flow rate results for the Infu
sor and Springfusor 10 but significantly affected the flow rate result
s for the other devices, for which there was a substantial terminal ph
ase with a prolonged period of reduced flow rate. The mean flow rate,
error, and coefficient of variation for the Intermate devices stored u
nder refrigeration were significantly different from those for the dev
ices not refrigerated before use. When operated as recommended by the
manufacturer, five of six devices had a flow rate error within the man
ufacturer's specifications; the results were affected by endpoint defi
nition.