Ah. Abdelmawla et al., COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTS OF NADOLOL AND BISOPROLOL ON NORADRENALINE-EVOKED VENOCONSTRICTION IN MAN IN-VIVO, British journal of clinical pharmacology, 45(3), 1998, pp. 271-276
Aims In an attempt to explore the possible involvement of venodilator
beta-adrenoceptors in the constrictor response of the human dorsal han
d vein to noradrenaline, we examined the ability of nadolol, a non-sel
ective beta(1)/beta(2)-adrenoceptor antagonist, and bisoprolol a selec
tive beta(1)-adrenoceptor antagonist, to potentiate the response. Meth
ods Twelve healthy male volunteers participated in three weekly sessio
ns. In each session nadolol (40 mg), bisoprolol (5 mg) or placebo was
ingested, and (-) noradrenaline acid tartrate (0.33-33.33 ng min(-1))
was infused locally into the dorsal hand vein 2 h after the ingestion
of the drugs. Changes in vein diameter were monitored with the dorsal
hand vein compliance technique. Subjects were allocated to treatments
and sessions according to a double-blind balanced cross-over design. S
ystolic and diastolic blood pressure, and heart rate were also measure
d. Results Noradrenaline produced dose-dependent venoconstriction whic
h was antagonized by bisoprolol but remained unaffected by nadolol (AN
OVA with repeated measures: F(2,22) = 5.07, P < 0.025; Dunnett's test:
placebo vs nadolol; t = 0.35, df = 22, k = 3, NS; placebo vs bisoprol
ol; t = 2.83, df = 22, k = 3, P < 0.01). Mean (+/- s.e. mean) log ED(5
0)s (ng min(-1)) were 0.44 +/- 0.15 (placebo), 0.73 +/- 0.11 (bisoprol
ol) and 0.50 +/- 0.21 (nadolol); mean (95% CI) differences were 0.29 (
-0.005, 0.58) for placebo vs bisoprolol and 0.06 (-0.35, 0.46) for pla
cebo vs nadolol. Both active drugs significantly (compared with placeb
o, P < 0.05) decreased (mean change from pretreatment +/- s.e. mean) h
eart rate (bisoprolol -16.08 +/- 2.01; nadolol -11.67 +/- 2.06) and sy
stolic blood pressure (bisoprolol -15.0 +/- 0.80; nadolol -9.47 +/- 0.
18). Conclusions The failure of nadolol and bisoprolol to potentiate n
oradrenaline-evoked venoconstriction argues against the involvement of
masked venodilator beta-adrenoceptors in the response. The mechanism
underlying the antagonism of noradrenaline-evoked venoconstriction by
bisoprolol remains to be elucidated.